Monday, January 27, 2020

Race. Ethnicity And Criminal Justice History

Race. Ethnicity And Criminal Justice History UK has been a multi-culture country historically whereby people from various origins, nations, races, religions, beliefs, etc. migrated to UK in the last two centuries. Largely, these migrants have been from Africa and Asia that form the ethnic minority communities within the UK. In the past 30 years, these ethnic minorities progressed very well in the UK and have been the victims of hate and racial crimes. Multiple research has been conducted pertaining to the causes of hate and racial crime in the UK (Gabbidon. 2009). This paper is a presentation of relevant literature review on the subject matter. 2.0 Migration, Racial Disadvantage and Ethnic Diversity Migration of people to UK has been in progress for at least two centuries but organised migration for living and employment has been occurring in past 30 years. The ethnic groups prevalent in UK are: Black Caribbean, Black African, Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Chinese, and other Asians and Blacks. Many of these groups have migrated to UK for education and employment and hence their primary target has been to achieve high quality professional education, get employed within UK or to open a business. Some of the people have entered UK through human trafficking routes and hence the crimes against them are much wider than the ones against ethnic minorities. The groups of Black Caribbean, Indians and Pakistanis are reported to be well employed in the UK due to their professional skills and good written and spoken English language. Their employment rates have been better than other ethnic minorities and even better than the local whites. (Gabbidon. 2009) McDonald (2009) argued that the ethnic minorities always remain within their groups with tangibly distinct differences in lifestyles. They can be identified very easily due to skin colour and different pronunciation of English and hence are easily targeted by others that hate them. He argued that the racial and hate crimes are not always conducted by local whites but are also conducted by one group of ethnic minorities against others. In fact some of the ethnic minorities have brought with them different flavours of crime to UK that has added to the already existing crimes of the UK. Migrants from some countries (like Caribbean, India, Pakistan and Bangladesh) have largely chosen to adopt the local way of thinking and living and hence do not cause nuisance against others (except for issues like domestic violence that is prevalent even in their native countries and has become one of the major issues in UK). But many other ethnic groups prefer to retain their original lifestyles and po ssess radical thoughts that make them deviant against the whites and other ethnic groups in the UK. As pointed out by Chakraborti and Garland (2009), a lot depends upon the circumstances under which the members of ethnic minorities migrated to the UK. While people from Asian countries migrated to the UK for higher pay packages (that is, to get richer as they were well off in their respective countries as well) others may have migrated to the UK amidst extreme poverty or impact of slavery and deprivation in their native countries. The history of events associated with the minority people matters a lot in the way they behave in the UK. The sense of being deprived or betrayed invokes negative emotions of hate, jealousy, prejudice and revenge that results in crime against other ethnic minorities in the UK and also the clashes between whites and blacks. This is one of the accepted causes of hate crime although the authors believe that this subject still needs enormous scholarly research to be established further. In fact racist crimes are classified as one of the categories of hate crimes given that racism can be one of the strong reasons leading to hatred but there are many other factors as well. The racist crimes are conducted by the people due to their hate against people of other races influenced by emotions like deprival, betrayal, difference of class, prejudice, etc. (Healy. 2006) The Home Office, UK has presented a wide definition of hate crime that includes criminal activities as a result of discrimination against disability, religion, belief, race, sexual orientation or transgender. The home office especially mentions that hate crimes are more important and different than other types of crimes because the people are targeted based on identity and the discrimination thus practiced is serious infringement of human rights and social equality. Moreover, they state that hate crimes result in serious psychological disorder and breakdown and can be disastrous for the British society because whole communities can become enemies just by criminal act against one individual. Serious social disasters (like riots) can be the extreme outcomes if the hate crimes are not handled adequately and indiscriminately. (http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/crime-victims/reducing-crime/hate-crime/) Gabbidon (2009) studied the pattern of punishments in the UK criminal justice system to discover that certain types of crimes are associated with the ethnic minorities such that the probability of getting sentenced for the members of the minority group increases. For example, Blacks are more probable to get custodial sentences for fraud, forgery and drug offenses and Asians are more probable to get custodial sentences for robbery. Similarly whites are more probable to get custodial sentences for community crimes and Muslims are more probable to be targeted for terror crimes. These patterns suggest some kind of mindset established in the judicial system itself that is inclined to believe that a particular ethnic minority group may be associated with a particular crime. These concerns have been raised by the 2006-2007 report by the House of Commons, Home Affairs Committee pertaining to overrepresentation of young blacks pertaining to crimes related to drugs, firearms and mugging. The r eport especially states that Young Black people are disproportionately subject to socio-economic disadvantage and social exclusion even by the judiciary and policing system. Quraishi (2005) pointed out that South Asian Muslims are perceived to be more involved in offensive crimes although the British criminology badly lacks researches on South Asians especially the Muslims. In fact the knowledge about the ethnic diversity in the UK is still very less and hence criminal justice system do take into account perceptions rather than facts. Muslims are more likely to be frisked for arms and explosives and blacks are more likely to be frisked for drugs. One can define this as racial disadvantage in the UK. 3.0 Reasons for crime against ethnic minorities Rutter and Tienda (2005) described social discrimination, deprival and poverty as two major reasons for crime against one group of ethnic minorities by another. It is not a fact that all members of an ethnic minority are poor or rich. The perceptions are driven by majority of the members of an ethnic minority group whether they are poor or deprived or not. For example, as described by these authors, Pakistani and Bangladeshis are also poverty stricken but they do not perceive this as a reason for deviance against the ethnic minorities that are richer. This again goes back to the theory of the circumstances under which they migrated to the UK and the objectives that had in mind to achieve from the migration. Asians come to UK to become rich and hence their entire focus is on earning more and more money. Caribbean blacks may have migrated to the UK through more congenial channels and hence are well placed and growing in the UK. They possess excellent spoken and written English skills a nd hence enjoy better placements in the British society. African blacks have migrated to UK under varying circumstances whereby significant number of migrations can be traced back to slavery and deprivation in their native countries by the whites. Hence, the reasons for crime against ethnic minorities need to be viewed from historical angle in the UK. They may be the traditional black-white clashes or else hatred and jealousy against Asians due to their comparatively better success. (Chakraborti and Garland. 2009) There may be other recent reasons like the significant outsourcing of UK jobs to India but they have not yet been proven academically at least from UK perspective (may be applicable in US however). The author has mentioned this point without an empirical support because this needs further investigation. 4.0 Policing against hate and race driven crimes Rice and White (2010) and the 2006-2007 report by the House of Commons, Home Affairs Committee pointed out that the policing system has been discriminate against the blacks in the UK. The black youths are doubted, arrested and imprisoned more often than Whites and Asians. The discrimination exists in the form of some kind of mindset against the blacks that may be the result of historical conflicts between whites and blacks in the African countries. Their reports suggested that blacks are often intercepted, ticketed and, in many cases, arrested just against doubts without substantial evidence. Further to this, Chakraborti and Garland (2009) stated that blacks do not get adequate police security and hence have been victims of violence amounting to serious injury or death in the UK. The case of Stephen Lawrence (in 1993) and the Macphersons report has been especially analysed by these authors to describe how institutional racism has resulted in increase of racism crime in the UK. Follow ing figure presents the statistics of race crime in the UK from 1999-2000 to 2006-2007: The statistics reveal a gradual increase in race crimes year after year. These figures are only the reported crimes because the British Crime Survey (BCS) reports reveal larger numbers (about 139000 in 2006) of racial crimes. The reports also reveal that ethnic minorities are at higher risk of racial crimes than the whites. The Macpherson report in 1999 opened a new dimension of institutional racism in the UK that confronted racial bias among the metropolitan police in London. The report recommended significant improvements in the policing and judicial system to ensure commitment towards a true and unbiased British society that needs to prove to the world that Britain is a true multi-racial democracy where everyone enjoys equal rights to live and survive. The report revealed that the police system itself is biased towards racism and the problem of racial hate in Britain today is much deep rooted in institutions, organisations and, most worryingly, in children and adolescents that are less than 16 years of age. The report justified the compliant by Mr. and Mrs. Lawrence that the Metropolitan police was biased in the entire investigation process and all the suspects were acquitted. The fundamental change that the police system needs to undergo is to visualise racism as a threat to modern British society and treat the same as a social challenge that needs to be resolved as effectively as possible (OBrian. 2000). The 2009 report by House of Commons, Home Affairs Committee claims that significant improvement in policing against racist crimes is evident after the term institutional racism by Sir William Macpherson had shaken the police community out of their complacency. The report claims that cultural change is evident in the police departments in the way they interact with ethnic minorities. The concept of family liaison officers has also worked very well. In another report by Crown Prosecution Service (2006), they claimed to have handled the racist murder of Antho ny Walker very professionally and proactively that resulted in prosecution of both the criminals responsible for the racist murder. However, as reiterated by the 2009 report by House of Commons, Home Affairs Committee, the black youth is still over-represented by the police given that they are six times more likely to be interrupted and searched. The report also reiterated that the misbehaviour with ethnic minorities under custody need to be controlled. Moreover, the role of family liaison officers need to be improved given that their responsibility is to ensure that the ethnic minority family of the victim is treated well by investigators and the updates regarding the investigations are periodically provided to the family members. The police needs to take an accountability of race equality and percolate the message to the natives of their region by means of appropriate communications media. 5.0 Ethnicity and criminal justice system The modern criminal justice system makes every government official to be responsible towards ethnic minorities. As per the Race Relations (Amendment) Act 2000, it is an unlawful offense for any government official to exhibit or practice racial discrimination while carrying out his/her duties. The act also requires that government departments need to publish their race equality schemes and justify how the schemes would be able to achieve promotion of race equality and good relationships with the various ethnic minority groups. In addition, the act also mandates close monitoring of the way the staff from ethnic minorities are treated in government organisations. The maximum impact on the public is carried out by the police and hence they are the ones that need to practice the mandates of the act most due diligently. The authorities in the police organisations have obviously not taken the Macpherson report positively and hence stop and search and custodial death cases have increased sin ce the report has been published as claimed by Abbas (2004). The Macpherson reports institutional racism targets Crown Prosecution Services (CPS) as well and hence the latter has been more proactive in the way they deal with racial violence against ethnic minorities. The Anthony Walker case is an ideal example in which the CPS directly approached police themselves and supported them to ensure faster investigations and faster prosecution of the accused. In fact the CPS assigned the senior prosecutor and involved the community leaders of the ethnic minority group much ahead of the police contacting them (CPS. 2006). However, the core problem remains that the probability of members of ethnic minorities getting prosecuted by CPS is higher and hence the perceptions need to be changed considerably by the institution in the coming years. The Race Relations (Amendment) Act 2000 implies fair trial of all accused by the CPS irrespective of whether they are members of ethnic minorities or are whites. The change is already visible but there is a long way to go. The other acts that enforce hatred and racial discrimination as unlawful are: Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006 Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 Disability Discrimination 1995 Criminal Justice Act 2003 S.145 Football offenses act 1991 (amended) Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 (http://www.crimereduction.homeoffice.gov.uk/hatecrime/hatecrime004.htm) 6.0 Conclusion The UK is a multi-racial democratic country where the social system has been formed by the combination of local British population and a number of ethnic minorities that migrated to the country. Maintaining communal harmony in the UK has been a major challenge in the past given that there are numerous reasons for hatred and prejudice emotions prevailing in the nation that are linked with historical events and facts. The British society comprises of Africans, Caribbean, Indians, Pakistanis, Bangladeshis, Chinese and other ethnic minority groups that have migrated to the UK under different circumstances and with different objectives. Hence there are crimes conducted by one ethnic group against another and also crimes conducted due to the historical hate clashes between whites and blacks. All organizations (including the Police departments) are made of human beings and hence racial emotions have been existing even in the government officials, police and judicial system. The event of rac ial killing of Stephen Lawrence triggered multiple changes in the UK racial system especially after publishing of the report by Sir William Macpherson and the definition of so called institutional racism. Sir William pointed out that racial feelings prevail even in the people serving Metropolitan Police Organisations and the Crown Prosecution Services. He recommended major changes in the way government officials treat ethnic minorities in the interest of long term survival of the British society. The report as opposed very strongly but improvements over traditional complacent approach of police and CPS are evident as reported by House of Commons. Home Affairs Committee. The CPS also advocated their proactive approach in solving the racial crime against Anthony Walker who was murdered by two white youths in a park. CPS promptly engaged with the police teams and ensured that the accused get the desired punishment that they deserve. These events are definitely improving confidence amon g the ethnic minorities but there is still a long way to go in the future.

Sunday, January 19, 2020

Mechatronics Basic Pneumatics History Of Compressed Air Engineering Essay

Pneumatic devices are assorted tools and instruments that generate and utilize compressed air. The construct behind pneumatic tools has its beginnings in ancient times, but it was non until the last 500 old ages that it genuinely came to fruition.BeginningsThe first compressors were likely bellows like devices developed sometime prior to 3000 B.C. They were used to supply little whiffs of air to assistance in fire starting. These evolved into larger, but non significantly more sophisticated, units used in basic metal smelting about 1500 B.C. The manus bellows used by early smelters and blacksmiths for working Fe and metals was a simple type of air compressor and the first pneumatic tool. Grecian mathematician Hero of Alexandria ( c. 10 to 70 AD ) is reputed to hold thought of the field that gave birth to pneumatic tools ( pneumatics ) in the first century A.D. There is grounds of some of his innovations powered by steam and air current.Air Pump/CompressorGerman physicist and applied scientist Otto von Guericke ( 1602 to 1686 ) is credited with holding invented the air pump or compressor in 1650. The device sucked out air or gas from whatever vas it was attached to. He experimented with Cu enclosures called hemispheres, showing that he could utilize the pump to draw apart the two halves. It could bring forth a partial vacuity and Guericke used it to analyze the phenomenon of vacuity and the function of air in burning and respiration. Two centuries after Guericke, pneumatic tools were developing beyond being mere exciting wonders ; they were now going practical. Development of pneumatics remained comparatively inactive until late in the eighteenth century when mechanical compressors achieved the capableness of bring forthing force per unit areas every bit high as 15 pounds per square inch. It was non until the 1800 ‘s that compressed air was earnestly considered as an industrial energy transportation medium. Once compressed air was commercially available, pneumatic devices were everyplace. The tight air was used to power little air-powered electrical generators in eating houses, infirmaries, and theatres. Engineers of the clip proclaimed tight air was the hereafter in energy transmittal and another emerging engineering, electricity, had far excessively many proficient defects to of all time be successful. During the late 1800 ‘s, the usage of tight air and electricity expanded and each found its topographic point ; electricity being the most convenient signifier for large-scale energy transmittal and pneumatics for specific industrial applications including power and procedure service and control maps. In 1829, the first phase or compound air compressor was patented. A compound air compressor compresses air in consecutive cylinders. By 1872, compressor efficiency was improved by holding the cylinders cooled by H2O jets, which led to the innovation of water-jacketed cylinders. Pneumaticss in the nineteenth century was dominated by the pneumatic tubing, which was popularized by people in Victorian England utilizing grapevines to convey wires from one telegraph station to another. Besides, John Wanamaker ( 1838 to 1922 ) , an American merchandiser, introduced tube systems to the United States Post Office ( when he was postmaster general ) and section shops for transit of mail points and money, severally.Pneumatic Tubes:The best known pneumatic device is of class the pneumatic tubing. A pneumatic tubing is a method of transporting objects utilizing tight air. In the yesteryear, pneumatic tubings were frequently used in big office edifices to transport messages and objects from office to office. The first documented echt pneumatic tubing in the United States is officially listed in a 1940 patent issued to Samuel Clegg and Jacob Selvan. This was a vehicle with wheels, on a path, positioned within a tubing. The most luxuriant application of pneumatic tubings, nevertheless, was when Alfred Beach ( 1826 to 1896 ) built a pneumatic train metro in New York City based on his 1865 patent. The metro ran briefly in 1870 for one block West of City Hall. It was America ‘s first metro. Alfred Beach practically invented the pneumatic metro line by showing that a pipe was able to transport riders. The Beach tunnel was constructed in merely 58 yearss, get downing under Warren Street and Broadway, straight across from City Hall. The station was under the south pavement of Warren Street merely west of the Broadway corner. The individual path tunnel ran east into Broadway, curved south, and ran down the center of Broadway to Murray Street, a distance of one block, about 300 pess in all. The metro opened to the populace on February 26, 1870. Operated as a presentation from 1870 to 1873, the short tunnel had merely the one station and train auto. hypertext transfer protocol: //t3.gstatic.com/images? q=tbn: U-mntn_iJyitlM: hypertext transfer protocol: //upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/aa/Beach_Pneumatic_Transit_01.jpgbeach-map Tunnel portal Tunnel schematic The â€Å" hard currency bearer † innovation sent money in small tubes travelling by air compaction from location to location in section shop so that alteration could be made. The first mechanical bearers used for shop service was patented ( # 165,473 ) by D. Brown on July 13, 1875. However, it was non until 1882 when an discoverer called Martin patented betterments in the system that the innovation became widespread. Martin ‘s patents were numbered 255,525 issued March 28, 1882, 276,441 issued April 24, 1883, and 284,456 issued on September 4, 1883. The Chicago postal pneumatic tubing service began between the station office and the Winslow rail route station on August 24, 1904. The service used stat mis of tubing rented from the Chicago Pneumatic Tube Company. Samuel Ingersoll invented the pneumatic drill in 1871. Charles Brady King of Detroit invented the pneumatic cock in 1890, and patented on January 28, 1894. Charles King exhibited two of his innovations at the 1893 Worlds Columbia Exposition ; a pneumatic cock for concentrating and calking and a steel brake beam for railway route autos. During the twentieth century, usage of tight air and of compressed-air devices increased. Jet engines use centrifugal and axial-flow compressors. Automatic machinery, labor-saving devices, and automatic-control systems all use pneumatics. Mass production on assembly lines as a standard industrial procedure increased the demand and application possibilities of tight air. Today, the list of industrial applications is really long.We use tight air for:Air Brakesair-blockAir Cylindersair-cylinders-for-pneumatic-system-tsc — tsu-73Air Motorsindustrial_air_motors_1Buffetingcp869p_1ChipingPneumatic-Chipping-HammerReamingMULTISPINDLE BARREL REAMING MACHINEreamer_offScrew Drivinghypertext transfer protocol: //www.pneumatictoolsonline.com/images/Screwdrivers/Screwdrivers-All-Models.jpgConveyingPneumatic-Conveying-SystemDrilling1142360549631_0306_spotlightproducts_18Promoting133073_062020076883_ExhibitPicFormingpaper-plate-machineCrunching41gFbya-SNLConcentratingpneumatic_riveting_toolTransferingiz2201Hoisting2854_1Blendingrx2k_daPaint SprayingDP6316-asturo-spray-gunPile Drivingpneumatic-pile-driverSuperchargingLow_boost_ideal_interceptProcedure ControlpneumaticStaplingCLX050108_028_1_2-de Blowguns – Using their lungs, early huntsmans could develop 1 to 3 pounds per square inchs with a capacity of about 6000 copper. in/min. Pneumatic stone drills – Early on in the nineteenth century, compressors had been developed which were capable of bring forthing 90 pounds per square inch. A tunnel undertaking was begun in Mt. Cenis, in the Alps, which was estimated to take 30 old ages to finish utilizing manual boring methods to cover 8 A? stat mis. Using pneumatic stone drills, runing from over 4 stat mis of air lines, the tunnel was successfully completed in 14 old ages. It was unfastened to traffic in 1871. This successful application attracted international involvement taking many metropolis authoritiess to speak of edifice cardinal compressor Stationss for citywide power. Compressed air used in Paris – Paris, the metropolis of visible radiations, was really the City of Air. In 1888, Paris installed a 65 HP compressor feeding 4 stat mis of brinies with 30 stat mis of subdivisions ( a converted cloaca system ) , presenting 90 pounds per square inch. By 1891, the capacity was increased to 25,000 HP Compressed air has been applied to command circuitry, dental drills, surgery, and many other industrial procedures necessitating high forces or impact blows. Light weight, lasting and safe pneumatic tools such as pneumatic stapling machines and pneumatically powered impact twists are common.Pneumatic constituentsThere are a broad assortment of pneumatic constituents available today.TubingTubing today comes in a broad assortment of sizes and can be made to the consumer ‘s demands. Air-TubeValvesvalves_1cActuatorspneumatic_automation-lAdvantagesComponents have long on the job life ensuing in thirster system dependability. Safe to utilize Merely Semi-skilled work force required for operation and care Best for usage in inflammable country. Far less traveling parts inside, therefore lower care demand. Light in weight, yet sturdy in design. Cheaper & A ; lower engineering options for control of velocity. Even sing investings on compressor, the pneumatic actuators are far more cost effectual in footings of cost of ownership and return on investing. If there is a power cut, pneumatic equipment will still work until the stored air in the compressor has been depleted. As there are no fluids involved they can be used in a cleanroom environment. Because air systems operate at comparatively low force per unit area, the constituents can be made of comparatively cheap stuffs.DisadvantagesCompressors and uninterrupted compaction can be expensive. Air intervention is required to take any oils, particulate and H2O vapor from the system. The constituents are non dependable at slow velocity. Very low efficiency, less than 50 % of input power is available at the work country.

Saturday, January 11, 2020

Evaluate the roles of named players Essay

Managing future energy needs is certainly a global challenge that requires the cooperation of many named players both on a small and large scale. It has been estimated that global demand for primary energy is set to grow 55% by 2030 and that $22 trillion of new investment is need to meet future energy forecasts. The main player in providing future energy security can be argued to be OPEC as they control the production of over 2/3’s of the world’s supply of oil, therefore leading them be price makers in the industry. OPEC is considered to be the most important player in global energy provision, it currently consists of 12 members and was created in 1960 mainly to protect the interests of member countries and to stabilise oil prices for a regular supply to oil consuming countries. However, OPEC’s obligations have been controversial as they have been accused of holding back on production of oil and gas in order to drive up prices, therefore using the market mechanism of demand and supply to increase profits for member states. Currently it has been proven that collectively, OPEC has stored 900,000 million barrels of crude oil, they own 78% of global resources and have a combined market share of 45% for oil and 18% for gas. This inherently makes them the largest producer of fossil fuels in the world meaning they will have a large if not absolute say in future energy provision and energy security. The responsibility of oil distribution will then fall on OPEC when supply of oil runs low leading to a bidding system for allocation of oil to where demand and price is highest. Another large player involved in providing energy security for the future is multinational oil companies; they are involved in the exploration and extraction of oil as well as transporting and refining the oil to consumers meaning they, as well as OPEC control the prices directly to consumers. Most of the top 20 oil companies in 2005 were state owned with companies such as Saudi Aramco in Saudi Arabia and PDV in Venezuela, this could be beneficial for domestic industry as they may charge less, stimulating the economy with lower production costs. However, many of the largest oil companies are relatively free of direct political influence and are therefore driven by the market mechanism leading to higher prices, above production costs. An example of a petro chemical company that has a direct impact on us in the UK is Gazprom in Russia. It solely controls one third of the world’s gas reserves and accounts for more than 92% of Russia’s gas production, but more importantly it provides 25% of the EU’s natural gas as we are consistently becoming net importers. The security of the energy provision is open to risk as Europe’s fear is that Russia will be able to name its price for gas because Europe is predominately dependent on its supply. In addition, the reliability is further doubted since Russia temporarily shut off gas supply to Ukraine in 2006 and therefore the whole of Europe. Fossil fuels are of course a finite resource meaning they will one day deplete to such an extent that it will not be cost effective to extract and refine to sell. This insinuates that it is the combined role of governments and oil producing companies to innovate and invest in new technology to sustain increasing energy demands. International Governments is the last and one of the main players in providing future energy security. Governments have the option of allowing oil companies to further exploit their own environment in order to increase oil production such as the case with the province of Alberto. It is estimated up to 2. 5 trillion barrels of are held within the sedimentary oil-shale – more so than in Saudi Arabia. This may relieve pressure for rising energy demand in the US as Canada does in fact have a surplus of primary energy. It will also relieve the US from its dominant reliance on the unreliable Saudi Arabian oil reserves with growing political challenges and the threat of terrorism and piracy. However, environmentalists see the exploitation of oil-shale are sands as a disaster in the making, not only does it already have detrimental environmental scars but with current technology, huge amounts of energy are needed in heating the sands to extract the oil (every 3 barrels of oil produced requires 1 barrel to be burnt). Conversely, Governments may opt to incentives conservation of energy through fuel duties or green taxes and emission trading as it leads to industries investing in cleaner technology. In addition, investment in greener fuels such as renewable and nuclear energy is a way for governments to secure energy provision in the future as it can be sustainable and everlasting. In conclusion, each player has a unique role in providing future energy security either with price stability with OPEC, investment into greener technology with oil companies and correct management and legislation from governments to both the exploitation of their environment and their fiscal system in incentive taxation. All in all it depends on the magnitude of integration of all these ideas brought forward that will secure actual energy provision in the future and allow for a sustained and secure increase in consumption of energy.

Thursday, January 2, 2020

Chhi 301 Papacy Paper - 1697 Words

RAMIFICATIONS OF THE PAPACY’S POWER IN ROME Church History 301 April 20, 2014 Ramifications of the Papacy’s Power in Rome The papacy – the office held by the pope as head of the Catholic Church - gained great power from the sixth through eighth centuries, and there are several reasons for this surge in influence. Starting around 590, Pope Gregory I sought to convert Teutonic invaders to Christianity. Islam was also in play, as it had taken over most of Asia and Africa. According to Earl Cairns, by trying to win Teutonic tribes to Christianity, the medieval church â€Å"†¦further centralized its organization under papal supremacy and developed the sacramental-hierarchical system characteristic of the Roman Catholic Church.† In†¦show more content†¦The power of the Bishop in Rome resulted from several factors, including the barbarian invasions, the failure of the emperors to defend their homeland, the success of Christianity, and the fame of the Church. The Roman generals battled over who would rule and thus failed to defend their borders adequately. This created gaps in the land, which was a factor the fall of Rome. With the invasion of the barbarians, it was up to the Church to defend the lands. Pope Gregory greatly influenced the situation. He was responsible for the improved standing of the papacy. He became Rome’s financial officer, and he managed food and water supplies. He created peace with the Lombards, and was able to ransom prisoners from them in the 6th century. He created a new Liturgy of the church, and he believed the purpose of the papacy was to help the poor, thus establishing the papal title â€Å"Servant of the servants of Christ.† Gregory turned a self-se eking papacy into an office of kindness and humility. Barbarians were invading Western Europe. Gaul, Italy and the Byzantine Empire were being raided while the church remained independent. The empire was divided but the church remained undivided and stable. With no true leader in Rome, Pope Leo II was the only defense against the Huns. As the barbarians invaded, the Church converted. Their motto was â€Å"to convert the monarch and the peopleShow MoreRelatedThe Rise of the Papacy Essay1637 Words   |  7 PagesCHHI-301-D10 LUO FALL2013 PAPER 2 The Rise of the Papacy INTRO In the void left by the collapse of the Roman Empire, the bishop of Rome grew even more in both power and prestige beginning in the sixth century and continuing to the reformation in the ninth century. It is the aim of this paper to explain how and why the papacy in Rome became the center of power of the medieval world, the factors contributing to this dominance over Western Europe, and the positive and negative ramificationsRead MoreWhy Were The Crusades?1389 Words   |  6 Pages WHY WERE THE CRUSADES STARTED SUBMITTED TO PROFESSOR C. PAUL KING CHHI-301-B06 LUO BY KEVIN SCOTT WILLIAMS JUNE 29, 2015 â€Æ' Why Were the Crusades Started Most have heard of the crusades of the middle-ages or at least heard of some famous people such as Pope Urban II, Richard the Lionheart or others. Whether you see the crusades as events that tried to promote Christian values in a pagan territory or of you see the crusades as chivalrous knights fight for a valiant cause one will stillRead MoreEssay about The Rise of the Papacy1770 Words   |  8 PagesThe Rise of the Papacy Barry Blankenship CHHI 301 - History of the Christian Church I Professor – Dr. Jeffrey S. Mayfield February 20, 2012 The Fall of A Great Empire and the Rise of the Papacy Before the fall of the Roman Empire you must stop and look at the power that was held within the millions of miles of land, building, people, cities, kings, and customs. The Roman Empire was not known for being just another city or empire but it was known for its strength, power and victories